Abstract
COMMITMENT OF INTERPRETER SAYYID QUTB IN THE WORK OF ABU SAHL MOHAMMAD AL-MAGHRAOUİ -HZ. MOSES AND HZ. UTMAN EXAMPLE-
In the context of social relations, human nature is not innocent. Although a person claims to think deeply and deal with an event in detail, it is possible to make mistakes from time to time. It is possible that these errors are sometimes on a small scale and sometimes on a large scale. So much so that even the prophets did not avoid making mistakes in the process that they did not have any data originating from revelation. Allah described such mistakes of theirs as landslides/slippage (Baqara, 2/36) and then showed them the most ideal way of behavior. Sometimes a leader's subordinate may make a different suggestion to his leader. In this regard, many different ecamples can be given in the life of the Prophet. For example, in the Battle of Badr, a companion’s suggesting a different place to the prophet about fixation of the military quarters, the prophet’s acceptance. As it is known, it is natural to have different views and different interpretations in every place and place where people are. In this respect, accepting people as infallible means giving them a superhuman status in a way, which we think does not quite agree with the teachings of the Qur'an on the subject. Different thinking, different perception and different interpretations will bring along the criticism activity. In fact, criticism is the most ideal tool to complete the missing or missing point. In this study, the owner of the commentary Abu Sahl Mohammad al-Maghraoui’s work al-Mufassirûn Beyne't-Te'vîl ve'l-İsbât fî Âyâti's-Sıfât, prophet Moses and the criticism of Sayyid Qutb (d.1966) about the third caliph Osman is discussed.
Keywords
Maghraoui, Sayyid Qutb, Criticism, Prophet Moses, Caliph Otman.
