Abstract
THE ROLE OF MEANING AND REPUTATION IN THE CONFLICT OF FIQUAL PROVISIONS
It is clear to everyone that the narrations consist of the deed and the wording as well as the meaning implied by those words. However, in cases where the words cannot be preserved as they are, is it possible to resort to narration with meaning? There are some disputes about this. For this reason, it is seen that there are some different views on the point of narration from the period of the Companions. There are those who give absolute permissiveness to the meaning and narration, or those who never see it as permissible, and there are also those who allow it under certain conditions. Besides, the main reason for the writing of this article, which we try to explain these different views with their evidence, is the effect of the meaning and the narration on the jurisprudence. It is possible to say that in this study, which we tried to explain, even with a related example, it has a serious impact on the conflict between the meaning and the narration. Because, especially when the evidences used by the scholars of fiqh sects to base their opinions on a subject were texts related to the same subject but with different words, it was inevitable that there would be some differences between them in terms of provisions.
Keywords
Meaning and Narration, Fiqh Ruling, Dispute.
